Monday, October 29, 2007

Sports Media: Reporting the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

In the early twentieth century, media coverage of professional sports was substantially different than what it is today. New technologies such as the television and the internet have altered the way sports are presented to the global community. For example, the media has developed new means of providing stats, gossip, and other sports-related news. While in the past, the newspaper and the radio were the main sources of sports information, fans today have more resources available, such as twenty-four hour sports television channels (like ESPNEWS) and sports blogs (like Chris' Sports Blog). However, the increased access to athletes and other prominent figures in sports has been problematic because there has been an increase in inappropriate behavior in the media by those individuals. An example of the negative effects of the new structure of sports journalism is the recent turmoil in Los Angeles over Kobe Bryant (seen with his daughter in the image to the right), as described in a recent ESPN.com article. Bryant’s time as a Laker has had its ups and downs; since the franchise traded Shaquille O’Neal, the team has not won a championship, and Bryant himself has struggled, personally and professionally. In the wake of this history, Los Angeles Lakers' Coach Phil Jackson publicly questioned Bryant’s commitment to the team, and Bryant felt obligated to respond to the personal attacks on his work ethic. Luckily, all parties involved in the Bryant saga remained level-headed, and the comments did not lead to a physical confrontation or other improper actions.

Another problem with the increased presence of sports coverage in the media is that there have been many instances of athletes making crude statements to the media that have no social value. For example, John Rocker’s legacy has nothing to do with his pitching career, but rather focuses on racist statements he made in a 1999 interview with Jeff Pearlman in Sports Illustrated. Rocker’s outlandish opinions included a diatribe on New York Mets' fans: ''‘I talked about what degenerates they were, and they proved me right. Just by saying something, I could make them mad enough to go home and slap their moms.’" Another example of professional athletes wasting time venting private business in the media comes from a recent Los Angeles Times article by Sam Farmer, in which he discusses how National Football League athletes Adalius Thomas and Ray Lewis have been trading insults back and forth in the media, serving no other purpose beyond providing fodder for the media to discuss. These types of statements pose a problem for our society because these athletes, role models for many children worldwide, are using their fame to air their private business publicly. If a person chooses to live his life in the public domain, he has to accept all of the responsibilities that come with being a prominent public figure. For an athlete, one of those responsibilities is to behave appropriately and not ignore their duty as a role model.

In order to address this problem, there are two critical groups that need to respond. Firstly, adults need to step up and state that this type of behavior will not be tolerated. While the media has the obligation to report the news, adults have the right to state that they will not support franchises that allow their athletes and coaches to air their grievances through the media. Adults need to become proactive in protecting those who cannot defend themselves – the children – by refusing to purchase tickets to sporting events and sports merchandise and memorabilia until the sports industry enforces proper social standards. Additionally, professional athletes need to accept the importance of their function as role models: children who look up to them. It is unacceptable for professional athletes to follow the example of National Basketball Association Hall of Famer Charles Barkley (see the image to the left), who refuted the notion of athletes as role models. While parents and teachers do have a more hands-on role in child development, professional athletes need to accept all the responsibilities that come with earning a living playing sports. Therefore, professional athletes must recognize the repercussions of their words and their actions, and regulate how they behave in a public forum.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

In a perfect World your opinion has validity, but last I checked, we are NOT in a perfect World. Athletes are athletes, they are not politicians responsible for representing and implementing what "we" the people represent, or for that matter, setting a good example for our children. I agree, as "Professional" athletes, they should be held to a high standard considering their constant exposure to the public. But just because they are athletes? For the most part, we are not dealing with scholars here! Come On!!! We are dealing with gifted, passionate, somewhat high-strung, achievers of the game. A more prominent and serious problem is the "out of control" media, whose skill-less reporting certainly effects children, and frankly, makes me sick. So instead of the plight to persecute the person that the media just happened to have a camera up their skirt at a very opportunistic time, lets point a finger in the right direction. Maybe it's the media that should take an oath to a higher standard of professionalism....

mhs said...

Dear Anonymous,

Thanks for reading my post.

I have to say that there are a few aspects of your post I disagree with, as you probably may have guessed.

Towards the middle of your comment, you state: "For the most part, we are not dealing with scholars here!" Personally, if I were a professional athlete, what you said would offend me greatly. We are not talking about writing a quality dissertation or some other skill that requires a high level of education. On the other hand, we are simply talking about not being rude in public view.

And while I can understand your opinion about the media being "'out of control'" as you say, I think you must recognize that the media has the right and the obligation to report the news. While we may not like the news, or the way the media obtains the news, the media has to report it. I think saying that we have to "point a finger" at the media implies that athletes have no culpability in this matter, and I think that is wrong.

Once again, thanks for posting.

Sincerely,

-mhs, http://lawandsports.blogspot.com

NN said...

I want to first start out by stating I agree 100% with your blog. I was once a college athlete at USC on the women of troy soccer team. I also ran track on the junior Olympic team, although I was never at the professional level, I still found myself in the eyes of young adults as a role model. Now, on the other hand I want to say your post is extremely important. I touched on young Hollywood celebrities being role models as well in one of my post. It’s always disappointing when one of our role model (celebrities) do something that’s not right in the public’s eye. I see that you focused on Kobe Bryant and the mix up that he’s had while being on the Lakers. I would have focused on something even bigger and more recent like the Michael Vick case. I also see that you mention the issues that John Rocker has faced with he’s racial incidents. Unfortunately, not all people can be perfect in the public’s eye. But, I found it extremely honorable that you mention how Charles Barkley has done beautiful things to give back to the young community who has followed he’s success and look up to him as a role model.

On the other hand, you have used great link roles that can give the reader a wider understanding of situations with these athletes, because not everyone follows professional sports. Your point also comes across straight from the beginning and gives the reader an understanding of what you have on the situation.

Overall, great post and well written!

mhs said...

Dear NN,

Thanks for the nice comments. I'm glad you found the post interesting.

Sincerely,
-mhs, http://lawandsports.blogspot.com

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.